3 Comments

  1. Joe Natoli
    Posted September 30, 2008 at 9:55 am | Permalink

    Amen Paul(s) — this addiction to getting customer intel is costing these companies money, and I guess it continues to surprise me that they don’t see that. To me it’s symptomatic of a larger issue — forgetting who you’re doing all this for in the first place: the customer.

    Thanks for the great comments guys!!

  2. Posted September 27, 2008 at 9:53 am | Permalink

    We still come across this all the time in our work at Foviance and I, like you can’t get my head around who thinks this is a great idea. We explain time and time again that it is like putting a guard on the shop door and forcing people to have the online equivalent of their DNA record stored forever just so they can go in and shop.
    If you wouldn’t do it in the offline world don’t do it in the online world! It is a fairly simple rule to follow.

  3. Posted September 21, 2008 at 12:03 am | Permalink

    Agreed.
    If you want to track your users, to bring value, then tell them that up front; and if users don’t op in, I would argue that you should still let them participate, maybe just with limited functionality. This feels like an example of a marketer running amok.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>